Coarsening at random: characterizations, conjectures, counter-examples
نویسندگان
چکیده
The notion of coarsening at random (CAR) was introduced by Heitjan and Rubin (1991) to describe the most general form of randomly grouped, censored, or missing data, for which the coarsening mechanism can be ignored when making likelihood-based inference about the parameters of the distribution of the variable of interest. The CAR assumption is popular, and applications abound. However the full implications of the assumption have not been realized. Moreover a satisfactory theory of CAR for continuously distributed data—which is needed in many applications, particularly in survival analysis—hardly exists as yet. This paper gives a detailed study of CAR. We show that grouped data from a finite sample space always fit a CAR model: a nonparametric model for the variable of interest together with the assumption of an arbitrary CAR mechanism puts no restriction at all on the distribution of the observed data. In a slogan, CAR is everything. We describe what would seem to be the most general way CAR data could occur in practice, a sequential procedure called randomized monotone coarsening. We show that CAR mechanisms exist which are not of this type. Such a coarsening mechanism uses information about the underlying data which is not revealed to the observer, without this affecting the observer’s conclusions. In a second slogan, CAR is more than it seems. This implies that if the analyst can argue from subject-matter considerations that coarsened data is CAR, he or she has knowledge about the structure of the coarsening mechanism which can be put to good use in non-likelihood-based inference procedures. We argue that this is a valuable option in multivariate survival analysis. We give a new definition of CAR in general sample spaces, criticising earlier proposals, and we establish parallel results to the discrete case. The new definition focusses on the distribution rather than the density of the data. It allows us to generalise the theory of CAR to the important situation where coarsening variables (e.g., censoring times) are partially observed as well as the variables of interest.
منابع مشابه
New Characterizations of Pseudo-frobenius Rings and a Generalization of the Fgf Conjecture
We provide new characterizations of pseudo-Frobenius and quasiFrobenius rings in terms of tight modules. In the process, we also provide fresh perspectives on FGF and CF conjectures. In particular, we propose new natural extensions of these conjectures which connect them with the classical theory of PF rings. Our techniques are mainly based on set-theoretic counting arguments initiated by Osofs...
متن کاملEfficiency of NPMLE in Nonparametric Missing Data Models
Suppose that a random variable X of interest is grouped or censored or missing so that one only observes a coarsening of X, i.e., a random set containing X with probability 1. It is assumed that the coarsening mechanism has the coarsening at random property. Suppose furthermore that the coarsening either equals X itself or that is a set with positive Xprobability. We modify the NPMLE of the dis...
متن کاملThe Concepts of Tightness for Fuzzy Set Valued Random Variables
In this paper, we introduce several concepts of tightness for a sequence of random variables taking values in the space of normal and upper-semicontinuous fuzzy sets with compact support in Rp and give some characterizations of their concepts. Also, counter-examples for the relationships between the concepts of tightness are given.
متن کاملciency of NPMLE in Nonparametric Missing Data
Suppose that a random variable X of interest is grouped or censored or missing so that one only observes a coarsening of X, i.e., a random set containing X with probability 1. It is assumed that the coarsening mechanism has the coarsening at random property. Suppose furthermore that the coarsening either equals X itself or that is a set with positive X-probability. We modify the NPMLE of the di...
متن کاملSequential models for coarsening and missingness
In a companion paper we described what intuitively would seem to be the most general possible way to generate Coarsening at Random mechanisms, a sequential procedure called randomized monotone coarsening. Counter-examples showed that CAR mechanisms exist which cannot be represented in this way. Here, we further develop these results in two directions. Firstly, we consider what happens when data...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1996